<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for |Navlog|</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.navlog.net/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.navlog.net</link>
	<description>Flight Dojo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:16:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What A Cliche! by Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.navlog.net/?p=26&#038;cpage=1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navlog.net/?p=26#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I actually have a good excuse: Freddie just turned two months and he ain&#039;t sleeping through the night yet! :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually have a good excuse: Freddie just turned two months and he ain&#8217;t sleeping through the night yet! <img src='http://www.navlog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What A Cliche! by Keith Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.navlog.net/?p=26&#038;cpage=1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navlog.net/?p=26#comment-13</guid>
		<description>In the coming days, eh? Looks like it was 6 months!  Get on it :)

I can&#039;t talk, actually, I&#039;m 7 flights behind in my flight log.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the coming days, eh? Looks like it was 6 months!  Get on it <img src='http://www.navlog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t talk, actually, I&#8217;m 7 flights behind in my flight log.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Landing by Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.navlog.net/?p=19&#038;cpage=1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navlog.net/?p=19#comment-12</guid>
		<description>And one wonders why I think the man&#039;s a curmudgeon! I kid, I kid!! :-)

Thanks again, Greg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And one wonders why I think the man&#8217;s a curmudgeon! I kid, I kid!! <img src='http://www.navlog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks again, Greg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GUMPS by Greg Penglis</title>
		<link>http://www.navlog.net/?p=10&#038;cpage=1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Penglis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navlog.net/?p=10#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Curmudgeon, huh.  I was 32 when I wrote that book.  

Have you ever thought of restructuring your checklists until they make sense and match how you actually fly the airplane?  As long as you include everything required by the manufacturer, why does it matter when exactly you check things as long as it gets done?  If you&#039;ve checked the fuel on or before your initial descent, switched tanks and done everything necessary to insure the engine/s will have fuel to land, if you don&#039;t find yourself a glider, why check the fuel again?  Fly the plane; gear, mixture/s and prop/s before landing; land the plane.  

Why do we adapt ourselves to the procedure without question, rather than adapt the procedures to best fit how we fly the airplane?  More fodder for discussion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curmudgeon, huh.  I was 32 when I wrote that book.  </p>
<p>Have you ever thought of restructuring your checklists until they make sense and match how you actually fly the airplane?  As long as you include everything required by the manufacturer, why does it matter when exactly you check things as long as it gets done?  If you&#8217;ve checked the fuel on or before your initial descent, switched tanks and done everything necessary to insure the engine/s will have fuel to land, if you don&#8217;t find yourself a glider, why check the fuel again?  Fly the plane; gear, mixture/s and prop/s before landing; land the plane.  </p>
<p>Why do we adapt ourselves to the procedure without question, rather than adapt the procedures to best fit how we fly the airplane?  More fodder for discussion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Landing by Greg Penglis</title>
		<link>http://www.navlog.net/?p=19&#038;cpage=1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Penglis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navlog.net/?p=19#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Hello Fred:

You can quote me, just don&#039;t put the whole book on line.  I do want to keep selling it.  That said, if you want to have some fun, ask your fellow pilots to describe how a plane turns, without using bizarre concepts like the horizontal component of lift, and simply describe the turn using only the force of lift from the wings, plus the axis controls of elevator, aileron and rudder, because that&#039;s all there is on the airplane.  

For even more fun, ask them to describe how an airplane flies, without using any of the pat definitions used to pass checkrides, or how a garden hose resembles a wing in flight and other absurdities.  And then ask them to prove their theory.

We could really have some interesting discussions here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Fred:</p>
<p>You can quote me, just don&#8217;t put the whole book on line.  I do want to keep selling it.  That said, if you want to have some fun, ask your fellow pilots to describe how a plane turns, without using bizarre concepts like the horizontal component of lift, and simply describe the turn using only the force of lift from the wings, plus the axis controls of elevator, aileron and rudder, because that&#8217;s all there is on the airplane.  </p>
<p>For even more fun, ask them to describe how an airplane flies, without using any of the pat definitions used to pass checkrides, or how a garden hose resembles a wing in flight and other absurdities.  And then ask them to prove their theory.</p>
<p>We could really have some interesting discussions here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
